Make
A hosted visual automation service that links SaaS applications and APIs into scheduled and event-triggered workflows.
Score calculation
(2 + 6 + 2 + 1 + 7) ÷ 5 = 3.6
5 of six dimensions rated. Unrated dimensions are excluded from the average.
Full scoring method ↗Setup details
Make cloud workflow automation service; data handling for third-party connected applications and external AI providers depends on those services.
What fits your needs
Make cloud workflow automation service; data handling for third-party connected applications and external AI providers depends on those services.
Good fit
Use it to connect business applications with a managed visual editor and a broad library of integrations.
Tradeoffs to expect
Tradeoffs
Workflow content passes through a cloud service and connected providers; data locality, execution limits and provider terms vary.
How to switch
Switching
Document scenarios, filters, mapping and credentials; recreate them manually or export where supported before leaving.
Practical questions
Before use
Map every connected app and data field, review the DPA and subprocessors, and confirm workflow retention and data residency for your plan.
Make has identifiable product documentation, but no measured energy footprint or clean-electricity sourcing evidence for the assessed route.
See the evidence
The official sources describe how Make is delivered and used. They provide no dated, quantitative energy or water report for this product and no evidence tying its requests to clean electricity. The pages reviewed also name no energy-saving workload or compute control.
1 + 1 reporting + 0 electricity + 0 controls = 2/10. This grades documented practices and transparency.
Per-request electricity and water use, regional power mix and independently verified clean-electricity sourcing for Make remain unpublished.
- Reporting1/3
- The Make documentation identifies the service route, but provides no dated, quantitative energy or water report for this product.
- Electricity sourcing0/3
- No reviewed official source ties this workload to metered, regional or hourly clean electricity; this is an evidence gap.
- Resource controls0/3
- The reviewed Make documentation names no energy-saving compute or workload setting for this route; no physical savings are inferred from speed, pricing or general configuration choices.
Water disclosure
Water reporting has not been assessed for this choice.
Training-data rights vary with the model selected for Make; check that model’s source and license.
See the evidence
Make lets the user select a model; assess that model’s training data separately.
Make can use different model routes. Its product policy describes how requests are handled, while training-data provenance and permissions depend on the selected model. Review that release’s source disclosure, license and creator controls separately.
The selected model name, version and provider can vary by feature or setting. Those details are needed for a model-specific training-data review.
Make stores run payloads in execution logs by default, with a per-scenario confidential-data setting that stops payload retention.
See the evidence
Make’s help page says execution logs include processed data for troubleshooting. The Keep data confidential setting prevents payload retention for that scenario, while run status remains visible; failed runs can also be stored as incomplete executions. The privacy notice and DPA describe cloud processing, subprocessors and deletion rights.
Apply the setting separately to every sensitive scenario, and check the selected plan’s execution-history duration and connected applications before activation.
Make is a hosted commercial automation service. Its product documentation explains integration and execution controls, but the application source and a self-hosting license are not offered.
See the evidence
The cited product pages do not provide a complete source release, reproducible model pipeline and license package for the full assessed service. Individual model licenses and artifacts can differ.
Public sources for Make describe the product, but do not report pay, worker voice or independent safeguards for the people who build and support it.
See the evidence
The official pages reviewed for Make do not report worker pay and conditions, representation or independent follow-through across employees, contractors and AI supply-chain workers. The low evidence score records what those sources leave unanswered; it is not a finding of mistreatment.
1 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1/10. Documented worker protections; missing disclosure is an evidence gap.
Pay, contractor protections, grievance outcomes and independent checks for Make's wider workforce remain unreported in the cited product documentation.
- Pay & conditions0/3
- The reviewed product and legal pages give no qualifying pay or conditions disclosure for AI supply-chain workers.
- Worker voice & remedy0/3
- No worker representation, grievance or remedy mechanism was established in these cited official materials.
- Evidence & follow-through0/3
- No independent worker-level assurance covering the product supply chain was established.
No military relationship for Make was identified in the official sources reviewed for this profile.
See the evidence
The cited product and policy material does not describe a defense customer or military deployment by Make. The score reflects an unverified relationship with no published safeguards in these sources, not a confirmed absence.
7 base + 0 safeguard adjustment = 7/10 (0 of 9 safeguard points; every 3 adds 1). No military relationship was established in the cited sources. This ranks above known defense ties without claiming a verified clean record.
This source review does not cover undisclosed customers, contracts, subcontractors or deployments.
- Use restrictions0/4
- No binding military-specific restriction was found in the cited public pages.
- Enforcement & oversight0/3
- No military-specific oversight or remedy was established in the cited public pages.
- Relationship disclosure0/2
- The cited material does not disclose a relevant military relationship.
The official pages reviewed describe the product, service and user terms; they do not identify a defense relationship or deployment. No identity, nationality or unrelated-company inference is used.
Military rubric ↗Make is not named in the two official BNC campaign lists; this is not an endorsement.
See the evidence
The check is limited to the BNC consumer-boycott guide and No Tech campaign. Neither list names Make; the result says nothing about other campaigns or suppliers.
This check does not cover every BDS campaign, local campaign, supplier, investment or subsequent list change; it is not an endorsement or clean-record conclusion.