---
title: "Radius | Ethical Stack"
url: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/
catalog_version: f6baff2119d0e9158520da7fbe4232011dac79f25bd08757436d7a1dbd593db2
---

# Radius

Early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi with organization-level controls and upstream model routing.

Canonical profile: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/

Scope: Radius is an early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi, not a model. The selected gateway policy routes requests to an upstream model and provider.

Published overall: 3.6; 5/6 dimensions rated.

Round the equal-weight mean of available numerical ratings to one decimal; require at least four of six for an overall score. BDS status stays outside the mean; for eligible profiles, a boycott target caps the final score at 2/10 and a pressure target subtracts one point (minimum 1). Not listed and not checked do not adjust the score.

## Energy practices

Finding: 3/10

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#energy

Radius is a model gateway; no energy or electricity reporting is available in the reviewed docs.

Reason: 1 + 1 reporting + 0 electricity + 1 controls = 3/10. This grades documented practices and transparency.

Argument: The provider/model route changes the inference destination. Radius documentation does not establish per-task consumption, facility electricity or resource controls.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (dimension): Radius is an early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi, not a model. The selected gateway policy routes requests to an upstream model and provider.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: Upstream provider, model, region, energy, water and electricity mix are not established.

```json
{
  "method": "practices-transparency-v1",
  "scope": "Radius is an early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi, not a model. The selected gateway policy routes requests to an upstream model and provider.",
  "components": {
    "disclosure": {
      "score": 1,
      "reason": "Gateway and route are documented without energy accounting.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers",
        "https://pi.dev/packages/%40earendil-works/pi-radius?name=pi-web&page=3"
      ]
    },
    "electricity": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No upstream clean-power or electricity mix is disclosed.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    },
    "demand": {
      "score": 1,
      "reason": "Organization controls and routing are available, but energy controls or measured savings are not documented.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers",
        "https://pi.dev/packages/%40earendil-works/pi-radius?name=pi-web&page=3"
      ]
    }
  },
  "actualImpactMeasured": false
}
```

- [Pi provider documentation including Radius](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [Pi Radius package and gateway documentation](https://pi.dev/packages/%40earendil-works/pi-radius?name=pi-web&page=3) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## Training data

Finding: Depends on the model

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#training-rights

Radius is a gateway, not a trained model; corpus rights depend on the upstream route.

Reason: Identify the upstream model and provider, then assess that model’s corpus and the route terms.

Argument: Pi describes Radius as a configurable gateway to upstream models. Gateway policy does not establish rights in model training material.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (profile): Radius is an early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi, not a model. The selected gateway policy routes requests to an upstream model and provider.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: Exact model, provider, version, base corpus and route terms must be resolved per request.

```json
{
  "method": "training-rights-evidence-v1",
  "scope": "The stated training release or selected model",
  "components": null,
  "routeDependency": "Identify the upstream model and provider, then assess that model’s corpus and the route terms.",
  "modelReference": null
}
```

- [Pi provider documentation including Radius](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [Pi Radius package and gateway documentation](https://pi.dev/packages/%40earendil-works/pi-radius?name=pi-web&page=3) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## Your data & privacy

Finding: 3/10

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#privacy

Radius routes prompts through an early-alpha gateway; its public docs do not fully specify retention, provider contracts or hosting locations.

Reason: Pi documents Radius as a configurable gateway with organization controls and analytics. Both the gateway and upstream model provider are in the data path; detailed retention and location terms were not established in reviewed materials.

Argument: Pi documents Radius as a configurable gateway with organization controls and analytics. Both the gateway and upstream model provider are in the data path; detailed retention and location terms were not established in reviewed materials.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (profile): Radius is an early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi, not a model. The selected gateway policy routes requests to an upstream model and provider.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: Prompt retention, gateway logging, service locations and provider contracts remain unclear in public documentation.

- [Pi provider documentation including Radius](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [Pi Radius package and gateway documentation](https://pi.dev/packages/%40earendil-works/pi-radius?name=pi-web&page=3) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## Openness

Finding: 4/10

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#openness

Radius is a managed early-alpha gateway for Pi, not a model release.

Reason: Pi documents a Radius provider integration and hosted gateway service; the package exposes integration code but upstream models and gateway service are separate.

Argument: Pi documents a Radius provider integration and hosted gateway service; the package exposes integration code but upstream models and gateway service are separate.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (profile): Radius is an early-alpha configurable AI gateway for Pi, not a model. The selected gateway policy routes requests to an upstream model and provider.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: Production readiness, service implementation and detailed operator controls are limited or unspecified while the service is early alpha.

- [Pi provider documentation including Radius](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [Pi Radius package and gateway documentation](https://pi.dev/packages/%40earendil-works/pi-radius?name=pi-web&page=3) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## Worker protections

Finding: 1/10

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#labour

Earendil Works has no workforce disclosures covering the AI supply chain in the reviewed public sources.

Reason: 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1/10. Documented worker protections; missing disclosure is an evidence gap.

Argument: The reviewed public sources do not describe employee conditions, worker voice, or contractor protections for Earendil Works. Missing disclosure is an evidence gap, not proof of mistreatment. This entry carries the same developer/operator finding to Radius; it does not establish that this product was deployed under every cited relationship.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (dimension): Earendil Works: the documented developer/operator record, not proof of deployment of Radius.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: Contractor conditions, data annotation and moderation, worker representation, remedies and independent review remain unknown.

```json
{
  "method": "worker-safeguards-evidence-v1",
  "entity": "earendil-works",
  "company": "Earendil Works",
  "scope": "Earendil Works employees and AI supply-chain workers",
  "components": {
    "conditions": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No worker conditions policy or implementation evidence was found in reviewed sources.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works",
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    },
    "voice": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No worker voice, representation or grievance safeguard was found in reviewed sources.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works",
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    },
    "assurance": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No independent worker-level evidence was found in reviewed sources.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works",
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    }
  },
  "disclosureLimited": true
}
```

- [Pi agent architecture and sessions](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [Pi provider documentation including Radius](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## Military ties

Finding: 7/10

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#military-contracts

No military relationship was established from the reviewed public sources for Earendil Works; the score reflects uncertainty.

Reason: 7 base + 0 safeguard adjustment = 7/10 (0 of 9 safeguard points; every 3 adds 1). No military relationship was established in the cited sources. This ranks above known defense ties without claiming a verified clean record.

Argument: The sources reviewed did not establish a military contract or operational defense offering for Earendil Works. The method starts at 7 when a military relationship is not established; missing disclosure is not proof that none exists. This entry carries the same developer/operator finding to Radius; it does not establish that this product was deployed under every cited relationship.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (dimension): Earendil Works: the documented developer/operator record, not proof of deployment of Radius.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: This bounded review cannot rule out unreported customers, indirect use, subcontracting or future work.

```json
{
  "method": "military-ties-priority-v2",
  "entity": "earendil-works",
  "company": "Earendil Works",
  "scope": "Earendil Works; no relationship established in reviewed sources",
  "components": {
    "restrictions": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No public military-use restriction was found in the reviewed sources.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works",
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    },
    "oversight": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No independently evidenced military-use oversight was found.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works",
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    },
    "transparency": {
      "score": 0,
      "reason": "No military customer or relationship disclosure was identified.",
      "sourceUrls": [
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works",
        "https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers"
      ]
    }
  },
  "disclosureLimited": true,
  "relationship": "not-established",
  "relationshipReason": "No military relationship for Earendil Works was established in the reviewed sources; this is not proof that none exists.",
  "score": 7,
  "baseScore": 7,
  "safeguardPoints": 0,
  "safeguardAdjustment": 0,
  "rawScore": 7,
  "cap": null
}
```

- [Pi agent architecture and sessions](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/how-pi-works) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [Pi provider documentation including Radius](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## BDS targets

Finding: Not listed

Assessment: https://ethicalstack.ai/providers/earendil-radius/#israel-palestine

Earendil Works was not named on the two BNC campaign pages checked. This limited list check is not an endorsement.

Reason: Campaign category, excluded from numerical scoring.

Argument: The BNC selects specific company targets; Earendil Works was not named in the official priority guide or No Tech campaign when checked. This is not a nationality-based assessment or proof that the company has no other relevant relationships. This entry carries the same developer/operator finding to Radius; it does not establish that this product was deployed under every cited relationship.

Type: argument; confidence: medium

Scope (dimension): Earendil Works: the documented developer/operator record, not proof of deployment of Radius.

Research reviewed: not recorded; evidence date: not recorded

Unknowns: This covers only the BNC corporate guide and No Tech page. Other BDS campaigns, local calls, ownership changes, contractors and business relationships are outside the check.

- [BNC official boycott and pressure guide](https://bdsmovement.net/Guide-to-BDS-Boycott) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

- [BNC official No Tech campaign](https://bdsmovement.net/no-tech-oppression-apartheid-or-genocide) (primary; checked 2026-10-28)

## Reading the evidence

- Assessments are provisional editorial judgments. Cite the profile and the underlying sources, and retain confidence, scope and unknowns.

- Unknown, not-applicable and model-dependent are different states. Missing evidence does not establish good or bad conduct.

- Company-level evidence does not establish use of a particular product or model. Account plan, model, host and route can change an assessment.

- Energy scores describe documented practices and transparency, not measured request emissions. Zero component points can mean an evidence gap.

- Published overall scores require at least four of six numerical dimensions. Preserve coverage and BDS adjustments; BDS itself is categorical.

- No named BDS target found is limited to the reviewed campaign sources and is not approval. Personalized priorities do not change the published overall score.

- Review and source-check dates describe the research, not this deployment. Fetch current primary sources when the decision requires current verification.

Methodology: https://ethicalstack.ai/methodology/